Landlord Mike Nijjar And PAMA Management Face Lawsuit From California Attorney General

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 14, 2025

4.5

Share

Landlord Mike Nijjar and PAMA Management Hit with Lawsuit from California Attorney General

California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit against landlord Mike Nijjar and his property management company, PAMA Management, alleging widespread tenant harassment and illegal eviction practices. The lawsuit, filed in Sacramento County Superior Court, paints a disturbing picture of systematic abuse targeting vulnerable tenants across multiple properties managed by Nijjar and PAMA Management. This significant legal action highlights the growing concerns regarding predatory landlord practices and the state's commitment to protecting tenant rights.

The lawsuit alleges numerous violations of California's Tenant Protection Act, including:

• Illegal Lockouts: The complaint details instances where tenants were illegally locked out of their residences without proper legal notice, leaving them stranded and without access to their belongings. This practice is a blatant violation of California law and constitutes a severe form of tenant harassment.
• Retaliatory Evictions: The Attorney General's office claims that Nijjar and PAMA Management retaliated against tenants who exercised their legal rights, such as reporting code violations or requesting repairs. This type of intimidation tactics are designed to silence tenants and prevent them from seeking redress for substandard living conditions.
• Harassment and Intimidation: The lawsuit alleges a pattern of harassment and intimidation tactics employed by Nijjar and PAMA Management against their tenants, including threatening phone calls, abusive language, and unwarranted property inspections. This creates a hostile living environment and violates tenants’ right to quiet enjoyment of their homes.
• Failure to Make Necessary Repairs: The complaint also cites multiple instances where Nijjar and PAMA Management failed to address necessary repairs, leaving tenants to live in unsafe and uninhabitable conditions. This neglect directly violates California's landlord-tenant laws.

Who is Mike Nijjar and PAMA Management?

Mike Nijjar is a prominent landlord in the Sacramento area, owning and managing numerous residential properties through his company, PAMA Management. While details regarding the precise scale of their operations are still emerging, the lawsuit suggests a significant portfolio of rental properties across multiple California cities. The Attorney General's investigation revealed a systemic pattern of abuse, suggesting these practices may be widespread throughout Nijjar's holdings.

What are the implications of this lawsuit?

This lawsuit is a significant development in the ongoing fight for stronger tenant protections in California. It sends a clear message that the state will not tolerate predatory landlord practices and will actively pursue legal action against those who violate tenant rights. The potential penalties for Nijjar and PAMA Management could be substantial, including hefty fines, restitution for harmed tenants, and even potential criminal charges.

Beyond the immediate impact on Nijjar and PAMA Management, this case serves as a cautionary tale for other landlords. It underscores the importance of complying with California's tenant protection laws and treating tenants with respect and fairness. Landlords who engage in illegal or unethical practices risk facing severe consequences.

What can tenants do?

Tenants facing similar issues should document all instances of harassment, illegal activity, and neglected repairs. They should also familiarize themselves with their rights under California's Tenant Protection Act and consider seeking legal counsel if necessary. Resources like the California Department of Housing and Community Development ([link to relevant CDCHD page]) can provide valuable information and support.

This lawsuit is currently ongoing, and further updates will be provided as they become available. The outcome of this case will undoubtedly have significant implications for landlord-tenant relations in California and beyond. Stay tuned for further developments in this important legal battle.