Post-Lopez Fight Fallout: De La Hoya's Fiery Condemnation Of Devin Haney

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 05, 2025

4.1

Share

Post-Lopez Fight Fallout: De La Hoya's Fiery Condemnation of Devin Haney Ignites Boxing World

The boxing world is ablaze following the controversial lightweight title fight between Devin Haney and Vasiliy Lomachenko, with Oscar De La Hoya leading the charge in criticizing the victor. De La Hoya's outspoken condemnation of Haney's performance has sparked a heated debate, reigniting discussions about judging in boxing and the future of the lightweight division.

The fight, which saw Haney retain his WBC, WBA, IBF, and WBO lightweight titles, was largely seen as a decisive victory for the American champion. However, many, including boxing legend De La Hoya, felt the scorecards didn't accurately reflect the action in the ring. Lomachenko, widely considered one of the greatest pound-for-pound fighters, mounted a strong challenge, particularly in the later rounds, leaving many viewers believing he deserved a closer decision, if not the victory.

De La Hoya's Explosive Reaction

De La Hoya didn't pull any punches in his post-fight assessment. Through various social media posts and interviews, he vehemently criticized the judging, calling it "a disgrace" and accusing the judges of favoring Haney. He went further, questioning Haney's fighting style, suggesting a lack of aggression and excitement that didn't warrant a unanimous decision victory. His comments ignited a firestorm online, with fans and pundits weighing in on both sides of the argument.

The Scoring Controversy: A Breakdown

The judges' scorecards read 116-112, 115-113, and 115-113, all in favor of Haney. While Haney undeniably controlled portions of the fight, Lomachenko's precise counter-punching and effective body work in the latter rounds arguably deserved a higher score. Many boxing analysts and commentators pointed to the perceived bias, highlighting instances where Lomachenko's punches seemed to land with more impact. This discrepancy between perceived action and the official scoring is fueling the ongoing debate about the need for greater transparency and improved judging standards in professional boxing.

Haney's Response and the Future of the Lightweight Division

Haney, for his part, has remained relatively quiet amidst the uproar, focusing on celebrating his victory and reiterating his dominance in the lightweight division. However, the controversy surrounding the fight casts a shadow over his achievements. The intense backlash from figures like De La Hoya threatens to overshadow Haney's victory and raise questions about his future title defenses. Will he face increased pressure to prove his worth against other top contenders? Only time will tell.

Looking Ahead: Calls for Reform and Transparency

De La Hoya's fiery condemnation is more than just personal criticism; it highlights a broader issue within the sport – the need for greater transparency and reform in the judging process. The inconsistencies in scoring often lead to controversy and undermine the credibility of the sport. This event underscores the urgent need for improvements to ensure fair and accurate judging in future boxing matches. This includes exploring technologies like improved scoring systems and more robust training for judges.

What are your thoughts on the controversial decision? Let us know in the comments below! Share this article with your fellow boxing fans and join the conversation! #boxing #haneylomachenko #oscardelahoya #boxingjudging #lightweightboxing

(Note: This article uses relevant keywords throughout, incorporates headings for better readability, and includes a call to action. Internal and external links could be added, depending on the platform and editorial guidelines.)