Post-Lopez Fight Fallout: De La Hoya's Fierce Criticism Of Devin Haney

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 06, 2025

4.1

Share

Post-Lopez Fight Fallout: De La Hoya's Fierce Criticism of Devin Haney Ignites Boxing World

The boxing world is abuzz following Devin Haney's controversial victory over Vasiliy Lomachenko, with Oscar De La Hoya leading the charge of critics questioning the decision. The fight, a highly anticipated clash of styles, left many feeling unsatisfied, and De La Hoya's outspoken condemnation has only amplified the post-fight debate. This isn't just about a single fight; it's about the future of boxing and the integrity of judging.

De La Hoya's Scathing Assessment

Following the fight, De La Hoya, a boxing legend himself, didn't mince words. He unleashed a torrent of criticism on Haney's performance and the judges' scorecards, calling the decision a "robbery" and questioning the legitimacy of the scoring system. His comments, shared widely across social media and various boxing news outlets, have sparked a wildfire of discussion among fans and experts alike. De La Hoya wasn't just critiquing Haney's fighting style; he also raised concerns about the potential influence of promotional politics on judging decisions, a persistent issue within the sport.

The Fight: A Point of Contention

The Haney-Lomachenko fight, held on May 20th, 2023, was a technical battle showcasing contrasting styles. While Haney utilized his speed and reach advantage, Lomachenko displayed his masterful counter-punching and ring generalship. Many viewers felt Lomachenko, despite Haney's victory, had done enough to secure the win. This disparity between viewer perception and the official result is the core of the current controversy. The judges' scorecards, awarding Haney a unanimous decision, have been heavily scrutinized, with many arguing that they failed to accurately reflect the fight's dynamics.

Haney's Response and the Broader Implications

Haney, for his part, has defended his victory, asserting that he controlled the fight and deserved the win. However, his response hasn't quelled the criticism, and the debate continues to rage. De La Hoya's vehement criticism isn't just about this particular fight; it highlights a wider issue within boxing: the need for greater transparency and consistency in judging. The incident underscores the ongoing calls for reform within the sport's judging system, with many suggesting the implementation of more advanced scoring technologies and increased judge accountability.

What's Next for Boxing's Integrity?

De La Hoya's outspokenness has injected much-needed urgency into the conversation surrounding boxing judging. His powerful criticism acts as a catalyst for discussions on improving transparency and accountability within the sport. The fallout from the Haney-Lomachenko fight, fueled by De La Hoya's strong stance, could potentially lead to meaningful changes in how boxing matches are judged and scored in the future. This is not simply a matter of opinion; it's a question of fairness and the long-term health of the sport. The future of boxing may depend on addressing these concerns head-on.

Keywords: Devin Haney, Vasiliy Lomachenko, Oscar De La Hoya, boxing, boxing judging, controversial fight, boxing news, fight results, boxing scoring, unanimous decision, sports controversy, boxing reform.