Oscar De La Hoya's Scathing Attack On Devin Haney Following Lopez Fight

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 05, 2025

4.9

Share

Oscar De La Hoya Unleashes Fury on Devin Haney After Controversial Lopez Victory

Oscar De La Hoya, the legendary boxing promoter and former world champion, didn't pull any punches in his scathing post-fight assessment of Devin Haney's controversial victory over Vasiliy Lomachenko. The fight, which saw Haney retain his lightweight titles, sparked outrage and accusations of biased judging from many boxing experts and fans alike. De La Hoya's fiery reaction has ignited a fresh wave of debate surrounding the outcome.

De La Hoya, known for his outspoken nature and sharp critiques, didn't mince words when expressing his disappointment. He took to social media and various interviews, launching a blistering attack on Haney's performance and the judging that secured him the win. The veteran promoter accused Haney of lacking the necessary skills to truly dominate Lomachenko, suggesting the victory was undeserved and a blow to the integrity of the sport.

De La Hoya's Key Criticisms

De La Hoya's criticism focused on several key areas:

• Haney's Performance: De La Hoya argued that Haney's fighting style, while effective in securing a points victory, lacked the dynamism and power expected from a champion against an opponent of Lomachenko's caliber. He questioned whether Haney truly outboxed Lomachenko or simply outpointed him through a more strategic, if less exciting, approach.

• The Judging: This was arguably the most incendiary part of De La Hoya's critique. He directly challenged the judges' scorecards, claiming they failed to accurately reflect the fight's dynamic and that Lomachenko was robbed of a deserved victory. This echoes the sentiments of many boxing analysts and fans who felt the scoring was heavily biased in Haney's favor. Many believed Lomachenko landed the cleaner, more impactful punches.

• The Future of Boxing: De La Hoya's frustration extended beyond the immediate aftermath of the fight. He expressed concern that such controversial decisions could damage the credibility of boxing, discouraging fans and potentially leading to a decline in interest in the sport. He hinted at the need for reform within the judging system to ensure fairness and transparency.

The Aftermath and Public Reaction

De La Hoya's comments have sparked a significant backlash, with many supporting his viewpoint and praising his outspokenness. Others, however, have defended Haney, arguing that the judges' decision, while contentious, was still within their purview. The debate highlights the inherent subjectivity in judging boxing matches and the ongoing need for improved transparency and consistency in scoring.

This controversy underscores the enduring tension between subjective scoring and objective performance in boxing. It also emphasizes the role of prominent figures like De La Hoya in shaping public perception and driving conversations about the sport's future. The incident raises important questions about the integrity of judging in boxing and the need for potential reforms to prevent similar controversies in the future.

Further Reading:

What are your thoughts on Oscar De La Hoya's statements? Share your opinion in the comments below!