Oscar De La Hoya Slams Devin Haney: A Post-Lopez Fight Fallout

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 06, 2025

4.3

Share

Oscar De La Hoya Slams Devin Haney: A Post-Lopez Fight Fallout

The boxing world is buzzing after Oscar De La Hoya's scathing criticism of Devin Haney following his victory over Vasiliy Lomachenko. The Golden Boy Promotions CEO didn't pull any punches, reigniting a feud and sparking intense debate among boxing fans and pundits alike. Haney's performance, while resulting in a unanimous decision win, left many feeling underwhelmed, and De La Hoya's outspoken reaction has only amplified the post-fight controversy.

<h3>De La Hoya's Explosive Comments</h3>

De La Hoya, never one to shy away from controversy, unleashed a torrent of criticism aimed at Haney's fighting style. He described the fight as "boring" and accused Haney of employing a "run-and-hide" tactic, lacking the aggression and excitement expected from a champion. His comments, shared across social media and various boxing news outlets, quickly went viral, generating a flurry of responses from fans and fellow fighters. The outspoken promoter didn't hold back, stating that Haney's performance didn't live up to the hype and lacked the dynamism of past champions. This isn't the first time De La Hoya has been critical of Haney; their history suggests a deeper underlying tension.

<h3>The Haney-Lomachenko Fight: A Controversial Victory?</h3>

The fight itself was a strategic chess match, with Haney effectively using his speed and movement to outpoint Lomachenko. However, many viewers felt the fight lacked the explosive action they anticipated, leading to accusations that Haney prioritized a win over an entertaining performance. This sentiment fueled De La Hoya's criticism and sparked discussions about the evolution of boxing strategy and the expectations placed upon champions. Did Haney prioritize a win over a thrilling display? Was his strategy effective, or did it fall short of the expectations set by previous high-profile bouts? These questions continue to dominate the boxing conversation.

<h3>The History Between De La Hoya and Haney</h3>

This isn't the first instance of friction between De La Hoya and Haney. Their relationship has been marked by past disagreements and contrasting opinions on the direction of boxing. De La Hoya, a legendary fighter himself, often advocates for more aggressive and exciting styles, while Haney’s approach is more calculated and tactical. This fundamental difference in fighting philosophy seems to be at the heart of their ongoing feud. This clash highlights the generational shift in boxing styles and the debate surrounding what constitutes a truly great fighter.

<h3>What's Next for Haney?</h3>

Haney's victory over Lomachenko cemented his place as a lightweight champion, but the controversy surrounding the fight leaves his future uncertain. The criticism leveled by De La Hoya adds another layer of complexity, potentially influencing his next fight selection and approach. Will he adjust his fighting style to appease critics, or will he remain true to his tactical approach? The boxing world waits with bated breath to see how Haney responds to the post-fight fallout.

<h3>Conclusion: A Lasting Impact?</h3>

Oscar De La Hoya's harsh critique of Devin Haney's performance is more than just a post-fight squabble; it's a reflection of the ongoing debate surrounding modern boxing strategy and the expectations placed upon champions. Haney's victory, while undisputed, sparked conversation about the balance between strategic dominance and crowd-pleasing action. The lasting impact of De La Hoya's comments remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: this controversy has significantly shaken up the boxing world. What are your thoughts? Share your opinions in the comments below!