Oscar De La Hoya Blasts Haney: A Post-Lopez Fight Fallout

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 05, 2025

4.2

Share

Oscar De La Hoya Blasts Haney: A Post-Lopez Fight Fallout

Oscar De La Hoya's explosive criticism of Devin Haney following his victory over Vasiliy Lomachenko has sent shockwaves through the boxing world. The Golden Boy Promotions CEO didn't pull any punches, unleashing a scathing post-fight assessment that has ignited a fiery debate amongst boxing fans and pundits alike. What sparked this unexpected outburst, and what does it mean for the future of lightweight boxing?

The fight itself, a closely contested battle between Haney and Lomachenko, saw Haney retain his undisputed lightweight titles via unanimous decision. While many considered it a masterful performance from the champion, showcasing his speed and defensive prowess, De La Hoya clearly disagreed. His criticism wasn't about Haney's boxing ability per se, but rather his perceived lack of excitement and engagement in the fight.

<h3>De La Hoya's Accusations: A Lack of "Heart"?</h3>

De La Hoya’s criticism centered around what he perceived as a lackluster performance from Haney. He accused the champion of fighting a "boring" fight, lacking the aggression and excitement expected from a top-level boxer. His exact words, delivered via social media and various interviews, were blistering, painting a picture of a champion who prioritized point-fighting over delivering a thrilling spectacle for the fans. He went so far as to question Haney's "heart," a serious accusation in the cutthroat world of professional boxing.

• "Haney fought a very boring fight," De La Hoya stated, according to several news outlets.
• "He needs to show more aggression," he added, emphasizing his disappointment with the fight's overall pacing.
• "Lomachenko deserved to win," a particularly controversial statement considering the judges' decision.

This isn't the first time De La Hoya has voiced strong opinions. Known for his outspoken nature and passionate defense of his fighters, his comments are rarely subtle. However, the intensity of this criticism, directed at a fighter not under his promotional banner, is noteworthy and adds fuel to the ongoing debate about the direction of modern boxing.

<h3>The Boxing Community Responds: A Divided Opinion</h3>

The boxing world is sharply divided on De La Hoya's comments. While some agree with his assessment, pointing to a perceived lack of action in the fight, many others have defended Haney, praising his intelligent boxing strategy and the effectiveness of his defensive tactics. They argue that Haney achieved his goal – retaining his titles – and that criticism shouldn't diminish his accomplishment.

Several prominent boxing analysts and former fighters have weighed in, adding further layers to the controversy. Some have argued that De La Hoya's comments are unfair and potentially damaging to Haney's reputation. Others have suggested that the criticism reflects a wider concern about the prioritization of points over exciting action in modern boxing matches.

<h3>What's Next for Haney and the Lightweight Division?</h3>

The fallout from De La Hoya's criticism is likely to have lasting repercussions. While Haney remains the undisputed champion, the controversy could affect his future matchups and negotiations. It also raises questions about the role of promoters in shaping the narrative surrounding boxing matches and the ongoing debate about the balance between strategy and spectacle.

The lightweight division remains one of the most exciting in boxing, with numerous potential contenders vying for a shot at Haney's titles. Whether this controversy influences the selection of his next opponent remains to be seen, but it's certainly a factor to consider. The future of this already-volatile weight class is certainly more interesting after De La Hoya's explosive comments.

Call to Action: What are your thoughts on Oscar De La Hoya's criticism of Devin Haney? Share your opinions in the comments below!