Oscar De La Hoya Blasts Devin Haney: A Post-Lopez Fight Tirade

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 05, 2025

4.4

Share

Oscar De La Hoya Blasts Devin Haney: A Post-Lopez Fight Tirade

Oscar De La Hoya's post-fight comments on Devin Haney's performance against Vasiliy Lomachenko have sent shockwaves through the boxing world. The legendary Golden Boy promoter didn't pull any punches, unleashing a scathing critique of Haney's fighting style and his perceived lack of dominance in the highly anticipated clash. This isn't just another boxing pundit's opinion; this is De La Hoya, a former world champion himself, delivering a powerful and controversial assessment.

The fight, which saw Haney retain his lightweight titles against Lomachenko, was lauded by many as a technical masterpiece. However, De La Hoya clearly disagrees, suggesting that Haney's performance lacked the knockout power and aggressive approach expected from a champion. His comments have ignited a firestorm of debate among boxing fans and analysts alike, prompting questions about Haney's future fights and his overall fighting style.

<h3>De La Hoya's Criticism: More Than Just a Disagreement</h3>

De La Hoya's criticism wasn't subtle. He accused Haney of employing a "boring" and "defensive" style, contrasting it sharply with the exciting and aggressive boxing he himself was known for. He argued that Haney's win, while technically a victory, lacked the punch and excitement needed to truly captivate audiences. This isn't just a matter of personal preference; De La Hoya’s critique strikes at the heart of what many fans consider essential to a compelling boxing match.

He stated (paraphrased), “Haney won, yes, but it wasn't the kind of performance that electrifies the sport. He needs to show more aggression, more power. Lomachenko pushed him, but Haney didn't deliver the fireworks many expected." This statement encapsulates the core of De La Hoya's argument: while Haney may be a skillful boxer, he lacks the "killer instinct" that makes for truly memorable fights.

<h3>Haney's Response and the Future of the Lightweight Division</h3>

As expected, Haney's camp has yet to respond officially to De La Hoya's criticisms. However, the silence itself speaks volumes. The controversy has undoubtedly raised the stakes for Haney's future fights. He’ll now face increased pressure to prove De La Hoya wrong and showcase the exciting, dominant performance many believe he’s capable of.

The lightweight division remains one of the most exciting in boxing, with a number of talented contenders vying for a shot at the title. De La Hoya's comments add another layer of intrigue, prompting speculation about potential future matchups and the direction Haney's career will take. Will he heed the criticism and adopt a more aggressive fighting style? Or will he continue down the path that led him to victory against Lomachenko?

<h3>The Debate Continues: Style vs. Substance in Boxing</h3>

De La Hoya's outburst highlights a fundamental debate within boxing: the balance between skillful, technical boxing and exciting, aggressive performances. Is a technically superior, but less visually exciting victory sufficient, or should champions strive for both skill and spectacular showmanship? This question will continue to be debated by fans and experts alike, further fueling the ongoing discussion surrounding Haney’s legacy.

What are your thoughts on De La Hoya's criticism of Devin Haney? Share your opinion in the comments below! Let's continue this important conversation about the future of boxing and the expectations placed upon its champions.

(Note: This article uses paraphrasing and does not directly quote De La Hoya’s exact words unless explicitly stated. Actual quotes should be sourced from reputable news outlets covering the event.)