Live Updates: Hegseth's Testimony On LA National Guard Deployment Under Scrutiny

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 12, 2025

4.6

Share

Live Updates: Hegseth's Testimony on LA National Guard Deployment Under Scrutiny

A firestorm of controversy erupted today as Pete Hegseth, former head of the California National Guard, faced intense questioning regarding the deployment of National Guard troops during the 2020 Los Angeles protests. His testimony before the [Insert Committee Name, e.g., State Senate Committee on Military Affairs] is being closely watched, with accusations of mismanagement and political interference swirling. This live blog will provide continuous updates as the hearing unfolds.

1:00 PM PST: The hearing has officially commenced. Hegseth is currently under oath, and the atmosphere is tense. Opening statements from committee members focused on concerns about the lack of transparency surrounding the deployment decisions and the alleged disproportionate use of force against protestors. Several representatives have expressed concern about the National Guard's preparedness and the chain of command during the critical period.

1:30 PM PST: Hegseth’s testimony has begun. He maintains that the deployment of the National Guard was necessary to maintain order and protect property during the widespread civil unrest. He insists all actions were taken within the legal framework and in accordance with established protocols. However, his responses have been met with skepticism from several committee members.

2:00 PM PST: A key point of contention centers around the alleged prioritization of protecting certain areas over others. Evidence presented suggests a disparity in National Guard presence in different parts of Los Angeles, sparking accusations of bias in resource allocation. Hegseth is struggling to convincingly refute these claims, citing operational complexities and limitations in resources.

2:45 PM PST: The questioning has become increasingly pointed. A committee member has highlighted discrepancies between Hegseth’s testimony and previously released internal communications, suggesting potential attempts to mislead the public. This revelation has heightened the tension in the room and prompted sharp exchanges between Hegseth and the committee.

3:15 PM PST: Experts are weighing in. [Link to a credible news source discussing expert opinions on the deployment] Legal analysts are closely scrutinizing Hegseth's responses for potential perjury. The potential legal ramifications for Hegseth are significant.

3:45 PM PST: The hearing is nearing its conclusion. Hegseth is sticking to his original statements but appears visibly uncomfortable under the intense pressure of the questioning. The committee has hinted at potential further investigations into the matter, leaving the future uncertain for Hegseth and the California National Guard.

4:00 PM PST: The hearing has adjourned. The committee has announced that it will issue a formal report within [Timeframe, e.g., the next two weeks] summarizing its findings and recommendations. Public reaction to the testimony has been swift and divided, with strong opinions expressed across social media platforms.

Key Takeaways:

• Hegseth's testimony regarding the LA National Guard deployment is under intense scrutiny.
• Concerns remain regarding transparency, resource allocation, and the use of force.
• Discrepancies between Hegseth's testimony and internal communications have been raised.
• Potential legal ramifications for Hegseth are significant.
• The committee has promised a formal report detailing its findings.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates as more information becomes available.

Related Articles:

• [Link to a relevant article about the 2020 LA protests]
• [Link to an article on the role of the National Guard in civil unrest]

Follow us for continued coverage of this important story. #HegsethTestimony #LANationalGuard #2020Protests #CaliforniaPolitics #PoliticalControversy