Live Updates: Hegseth Remains Silent On Respecting Court Ruling For LA National Guard Deployment

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 13, 2025

4.6

Share

Live Updates: Hegseth Remains Silent on Respecting Court Ruling for LA National Guard Deployment

A federal judge's decision to halt the deployment of the California National Guard to the US-Mexico border has left a void in public commentary, particularly from prominent figures like Pete Hegseth. The ruling, issued late Tuesday, cited concerns over the legality of Governor Newsom's deployment order. While legal experts dissect the implications, silence from key political figures raises questions about the future of border security initiatives.

The order, temporarily blocking the deployment of approximately 400 National Guard soldiers to the California-Mexico border, was met with swift reactions from various advocacy groups. However, a notable absence in the public discourse surrounds the opinions of conservative commentators like Fox News' Pete Hegseth, a vocal advocate for stricter border control measures. His silence, in the face of a decision that seemingly undermines his publicly stated positions, is sparking considerable online discussion and speculation.

<h3>The Judge's Ruling and its Implications</h3>

US District Judge Jesus Bernal's ruling stemmed from a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Southern California. The ACLU argued that the deployment was illegal, exceeding the Governor's authority and potentially violating the Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts the use of the military for domestic law enforcement purposes. The judge's decision to grant a temporary restraining order underscores the legal complexities surrounding the use of National Guard troops in border security operations. [Link to Court Document]

The ruling is not a final decision on the legality of the deployment; rather, it temporarily halts the operation pending further legal proceedings. This temporary halt, however, represents a significant setback for proponents of increased border security measures.

<h3>Hegseth's Past Statements and the Current Silence</h3>

Pete Hegseth has been a prominent voice advocating for increased border security and the use of the National Guard at the border. His past public statements strongly suggest he would oppose any measures that limit the deployment of troops. This makes his current silence particularly noteworthy. Several online forums are buzzing with speculation, with some suggesting a strategic silence while others point to potential internal disagreements within the conservative movement.

The lack of a public statement from Hegseth or his representatives leaves many questions unanswered. Will he publicly support the Governor's appeal? Will he shift his stance on the deployment strategy in light of the legal challenge? Only time will tell.

<h3>What's Next?</h3>

The legal battle over the deployment of the California National Guard is far from over. Governor Newsom's administration is expected to appeal the judge's ruling, setting the stage for a potentially lengthy legal process. The outcome of this appeal will have significant implications for future border security strategies and the role of the National Guard in such operations. Further updates will be provided as the situation unfolds.

Stay tuned for further updates as this story develops. We will continue to monitor the situation and provide timely and accurate information as it becomes available. Check back often for the latest developments in this unfolding legal battle and the ongoing silence from key political figures like Pete Hegseth.

Keywords: Pete Hegseth, California National Guard, Border Security, US-Mexico Border, Court Ruling, Judge Bernal, ACLU, Posse Comitatus Act, Governor Newsom, National Guard Deployment, Legal Challenge, Temporary Restraining Order, Legal Implications, Political Commentary, Live Updates.