Kristi Noem's Claim Of Deploying National Guard Against Protesters: A Timeline Of Events

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 13, 2025

4.3

Share

Kristi Noem's National Guard Deployment Claim: A Timeline of Events and Fact-Check

South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem's actions during the 2020 racial justice protests have drawn significant scrutiny, particularly her claims regarding the deployment of the National Guard. While she portrayed a strong stance against protestors, a closer examination reveals a more nuanced – and at times, contested – narrative. This article provides a timeline of events and examines the veracity of Governor Noem's statements.

The Backdrop: Summer 2020 Protests in South Dakota

The summer of 2020 saw widespread protests across the United States following the death of George Floyd. South Dakota, while experiencing less intense demonstrations compared to larger cities, did see protests in Sioux Falls and Rapid City. These protests, largely peaceful, focused on issues of racial justice and police brutality.

Timeline of Events:

• Early June 2020: Protests begin in Sioux Falls and Rapid City. Reports emerge of some minor property damage and clashes with law enforcement.
• Mid-June 2020: Governor Noem publicly addresses the protests, emphasizing the importance of maintaining order and protecting businesses. She frequently used strong rhetoric against protesters, characterizing them as threats to public safety.
• Late June 2020: Governor Noem announces the potential deployment of the South Dakota National Guard. This announcement, however, lacked specifics regarding the scale and nature of the deployment. Crucially, no significant deployment of the National Guard to quell protests actually occurred.
• July 2020 Onward: The protests gradually subsided. Governor Noem continued to defend her stance, asserting that her preparedness prevented widespread violence. This claim, however, has been challenged by critics who point to the relatively peaceful nature of the demonstrations and the lack of substantial National Guard involvement.

Examining the Claims:

Governor Noem consistently framed her actions as a necessary preventative measure to protect lives and property. She frequently stated that her readiness to deploy the National Guard deterred potential violence. However, independent analyses and reports from local news outlets suggest a different story. Many argue that the protests, while sometimes disruptive, remained largely peaceful and did not necessitate the deployment of the National Guard. The lack of widespread violence or significant property damage undermines the Governor's claim that a major intervention was required.

The Political Context:

It's crucial to understand the political context surrounding Governor Noem's actions. Her strong, often confrontational, stance on the protests aligned with her conservative base and helped solidify her image as a decisive leader. This approach, however, also drew criticism from those who viewed it as unnecessarily aggressive and potentially inflammatory.

Conclusion: A Question of Perception and Reality?

Governor Noem's claim regarding the deployment of the National Guard to counter protests remains a subject of debate. While she presented a picture of proactive leadership preventing widespread unrest, the reality on the ground suggests a different narrative. The lack of significant National Guard deployment, coupled with relatively peaceful demonstrations, raises questions about the accuracy and purpose of the Governor's statements. This event highlights the importance of critically examining claims made by political figures, particularly when those claims involve security forces and public order. Further research and analysis are needed to fully understand the motivations and impact of Governor Noem's actions during the 2020 protests.

Keywords: Kristi Noem, South Dakota National Guard, 2020 protests, racial justice protests, Sioux Falls, Rapid City, George Floyd, fact-check, timeline, political context, police brutality.