Haney Under Fire: De La Hoya's Harsh Criticism After Teofimo Lopez Defeat

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 06, 2025

4.6

Share

Haney Under Fire: De La Hoya's Harsh Criticism After Teofimo Lopez Defeat

Lightweight boxing champion Devin Haney is facing a barrage of criticism following his controversial win against Teofimo Lopez, with Oscar De La Hoya leading the charge. The fight, a highly anticipated clash of styles, ended with Haney securing a unanimous decision victory, but the scoring has sparked outrage among fans and experts alike, with many accusing the judges of bias. De La Hoya's scathing comments have only intensified the debate.

The fight, held on December 3rd, 2023, (update date as needed) saw Haney retain his WBC, WBA, IBF, and WBO lightweight titles. While Haney displayed his characteristic speed and precision, many felt Lopez landed the more impactful blows throughout the 12 rounds. The judges' scorecards, however, painted a different picture, awarding Haney the victory with scores of 116-112, 115-113, and 115-113. This disparity between perceived performance and official results has fueled significant controversy within the boxing community.

<h3>De La Hoya's Explosive Reaction</h3>

Oscar De La Hoya, a boxing legend and prominent figure in the sport, didn't mince words in his assessment of the fight. He took to social media to express his disbelief, labeling the decision a "robbery" and questioning the integrity of the judging process. De La Hoya's strong words – echoing the sentiments of many viewers – have thrust the debate into the mainstream, prompting widespread discussion about the judging criteria in professional boxing and the need for greater transparency and accountability. His comments have ignited a firestorm, with many calling for an immediate review of the scoring system.

"That was a robbery! Lopez clearly won that fight. The judges need to be held accountable," De La Hoya tweeted. His statement, coupled with similar reactions from prominent boxing analysts and former fighters, highlights a growing concern about the fairness and consistency of judging in high-profile boxing matches.

<h3>Haney's Response and the Future of Lightweight Boxing</h3>

Haney, naturally, defended his victory, asserting that he controlled the fight and deserved the win. He acknowledged the close nature of the contest but maintained his confidence in his performance. However, his response has done little to quell the controversy surrounding the fight, leaving a lingering sense of unease amongst fans.

This highly controversial outcome casts a shadow over Haney's otherwise impressive undefeated record. It raises serious questions about the future of the lightweight division and the reliability of judging in the sport. The incident underlines the need for improvements in judging protocols to ensure greater fairness and accuracy. The boxing community awaits a potential rematch or further developments with bated breath.

<h3>The Need for Reform in Boxing Judging</h3>

The Haney-Lopez fight serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing debate surrounding boxing judging. Many believe the current system is flawed and prone to subjective interpretations. Calls for increased transparency, stricter judging criteria, and perhaps even the implementation of technology to aid in scoring are gaining traction. This controversy is likely to fuel the ongoing conversation about how to improve the accuracy and fairness of boxing judging worldwide. Changes are needed to restore faith in the integrity of the sport.

What are your thoughts on the Haney-Lopez fight? Share your opinions in the comments below! (CTA)