Five Tired Tropes Holding Back ABC's Otherwise Successful Crime Drama

James

3 min read

Post on Sep 16, 2025

4.4

Share

Five Tired Tropes Holding Back ABC's Otherwise Successful Crime Drama

ABC's latest crime drama has captivated audiences with its compelling characters and intriguing mysteries. However, even the most promising shows can fall victim to overused tropes, and this one is no exception. While the series boasts strong performances and a generally well-crafted narrative, several tired clichés threaten to derail its potential for greatness. Let's delve into five specific tropes holding this otherwise successful show back.

1. The Unreliable Narrator: A Worn-Out Device

The use of an unreliable narrator is a staple in crime dramas, aiming to create suspense and keep viewers guessing. However, in this case, the constant shifting perspectives and questionable motives of the main character feel less like a clever plot device and more like a lazy shortcut to generating mystery. While unpredictability is crucial, relying too heavily on this trope can lead to audience frustration and a sense of manipulation rather than genuine intrigue. It's time for a fresh approach to storytelling that prioritizes clarity and trust, even amidst the chaos of a crime investigation.

2. The "Genius" Detective Who Breaks the Rules:

We've all seen it: the brilliant, maverick detective who operates outside the system, bending or breaking rules to solve the case. While this archetype can be compelling in moderation, the protagonist's constant disregard for procedure feels less rebellious and more reckless. This trope, while initially exciting, quickly becomes predictable and diminishes the stakes. A more nuanced portrayal of a skilled detective who operates within ethical boundaries would be far more refreshing. Think of shows like Bosch which, while featuring a morally grey protagonist, still maintain a sense of accountability.

3. The Implausible Coincidence:

Crime dramas often rely on coincidences to advance the plot, but in this show, they border on the absurd. Characters bump into each other in improbable settings, crucial clues are conveniently discovered, and seemingly unrelated events magically converge. While a certain level of coincidence is inherent in storytelling, the sheer frequency of these events undermines the narrative's credibility. A more organic and believable plot development would significantly enhance the viewer experience.

4. The Overly Convenient Red Herring:

Red herrings are essential for maintaining suspense, but this show throws in so many that they lose their impact. The constant introduction of seemingly suspicious characters, only to reveal them as irrelevant, creates a sense of exhaustion rather than suspense. Effective red herrings are subtle and integrated into the narrative seamlessly; this show's approach feels forced and predictable. A more strategic and sparingly used red herring would heighten the tension and keep viewers truly engaged.

5. The Predictable "Twist" Ending:

The final revelation in many episodes feels far too predictable, sacrificing genuine surprise for a sense of contrived closure. While the show excels in character development and atmosphere, the predictable twists undermine the payoff of the intricate investigations. Instead of relying on tired plot devices, the writers should focus on crafting unexpected yet believable resolutions that genuinely reward the audience's investment.

The Path Forward: A Call for Innovation

Despite these shortcomings, ABC's crime drama retains a strong core. By addressing these tired tropes and embracing more innovative storytelling techniques, this promising series could truly reach its full potential. The show's producers should consider investing in fresh storylines and exploring different narrative approaches to avoid becoming just another predictable crime drama. Are you a fan of this show? Share your thoughts in the comments below!