De La Hoya's Post-Fight Criticism: Haney Faces Backlash After Lopez Defeat

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 05, 2025

4.1

Share

De La Hoya's Post-Fight Criticism: Haney Faces Backlash After Lopez Defeat

Oscar De La Hoya's scathing criticism of Devin Haney following his controversial victory over Vasiliy Lomachenko has ignited a firestorm of debate within the boxing world. The fight, which saw Haney retain his WBC lightweight title, was met with mixed reactions, with many feeling the judges' scorecards didn't accurately reflect the action in the ring. De La Hoya's outspoken comments have only amplified the already intense post-fight analysis.

A Controversial Decision Sparks Outrage:

The May 20th clash between Haney and Lomachenko was billed as a generational matchup, pitting the undefeated champion against the legendary Ukrainian boxer. While Haney technically won a unanimous decision, many boxing analysts and fans believed Lomachenko deserved the victory, citing his superior aggression and cleaner punches throughout the twelve rounds. The judges' scores – 116-112, 115-113, and 115-113 – sparked immediate controversy, with accusations of biased judging flooding social media.

De La Hoya Weighs In: Harsh Words for Haney:

Adding fuel to the fire, Oscar De La Hoya, the legendary boxer and current promoter, didn't mince words in his assessment of Haney's performance. In a series of tweets and interviews, De La Hoya labeled the decision a "robbery" and criticized Haney's fighting style, suggesting he lacked the aggression needed to convincingly defeat a fighter of Lomachenko's caliber. De La Hoya's comments, known for their blunt honesty, have certainly not been met with universal agreement, but they have undoubtedly kept the conversation buzzing.

Haney's Response and the Ongoing Debate:

Haney, naturally, has defended his victory, highlighting his strategic approach and pointing out that he successfully outboxed Lomachenko over the course of the fight. He maintains that he won fairly and that the judges' decision was justified. This conflicting narrative has only served to heighten the ongoing debate surrounding the fight's outcome and the validity of the judging. The discussion extends beyond simply who won; it probes deeper into the criteria used for judging boxing matches and the inconsistencies often perceived within the sport.

The Future of Lightweight Boxing:

The fallout from this controversial fight has significant implications for the future of the lightweight division. Lomachenko’s potential retirement looms large, leaving a void at the top. Haney's continued reign as champion, however, is now intertwined with the debate surrounding his performance and the legitimacy of his victory. Will this controversy affect his future fights and his standing within the boxing community? Only time will tell.

Key Takeaways:

• Controversial Judging: The judges' scorecards were widely criticized as inaccurate by many experts and fans.
• De La Hoya's Criticism: Oscar De La Hoya's strong condemnation of Haney's performance fueled the post-fight debate.
• Haney's Defense: Haney maintains that he won fairly and his strategy was effective.
• Future Implications: The controversy impacts the future of the lightweight division and Haney’s reputation.

This fight highlights the inherent subjectivity in judging combat sports and the lasting impact of controversial decisions. The aftermath, fueled by De La Hoya's outspoken criticism, ensures this fight will be remembered as more than just a title defense – it’s a case study in the complexities of boxing judging and the enduring power of post-fight analysis. What are your thoughts on the fight and De La Hoya's comments? Share your opinion in the comments below!