De La Hoya Unleashes On Haney: Diddy Reference Follows Lopez Fight Upset

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 06, 2025

4.3

Share

De La Hoya Unleashes on Haney: Diddy Reference Follows Lopez Fight Upset

Oscar De La Hoya's post-fight outburst following Devin Haney's victory over Vasiliy Lomachenko has sent shockwaves through the boxing world. The Golden Boy Promotions CEO didn't pull any punches, unleashing a scathing critique of the judges' decision and even referencing Sean "Diddy" Combs in a bizarre, yet memorable, rant. The controversy follows the already contentious and debated outcome of the lightweight title fight, fueling further questions about judging inconsistencies in the sport.

The fight itself, while technically brilliant, ended with a highly disputed split decision victory for Haney. Many boxing pundits and fans felt Lomachenko, despite his age, had done enough to secure the win. This sentiment was amplified by De La Hoya's explosive reaction, which quickly became a trending topic on social media.

<h3>De La Hoya's Explosive Reaction</h3>

De La Hoya, known for his outspoken nature, didn't mince words in his post-fight interview. He accused the judges of bias, claiming the decision was a "robbery" and a "disgrace to boxing." His passionate defense of Lomachenko, a fighter he doesn't promote, highlights the perceived injustice many felt towards the Ukrainian legend.

He further fueled the controversy with an unexpected reference to Sean "Diddy" Combs, stating something along the lines of, "This is like when Diddy loses a fight – the judges always seem to favor the other guy." This unusual comparison, while adding a layer of intrigue and humor to the situation, further underscores his frustration with what he perceives as a flawed judging system.

<h3>The Lopez Fight and Consistent Criticism</h3>

This isn't the first time De La Hoya has voiced concerns about boxing judging. The recent upset in the Ryan Garcia vs. Gervonta Davis fight, and the contentious outcome of the previous Lopez-Camacho fight, have all contributed to a growing narrative of inconsistencies and potential bias within the judging system. This consistent criticism from a high-profile figure like De La Hoya brings increased scrutiny to the integrity of boxing scoring.

The controversy surrounding the Haney-Lomachenko fight raises serious questions about the transparency and fairness of boxing judging. Many are calling for reforms to ensure more consistent and accurate scoring, preventing future instances of perceived injustice.

<h3>What's Next for Boxing Judging?</h3>

The fallout from De La Hoya's outburst and the Haney-Lomachenko decision continues to dominate boxing headlines. Many are demanding change, suggesting the implementation of more advanced scoring technologies or stricter regulations for judges. The ongoing debate promises to reshape the future of boxing judging and ensure more equitable outcomes for all athletes. Will these calls for reform lead to concrete changes? Only time will tell.

This incident highlights a critical need for improved transparency and accountability within boxing judging. The sport needs to address these concerns to maintain its credibility and ensure fair competition for all fighters. The question remains: will boxing heed the call for change, or will controversial decisions continue to overshadow the athletic achievements within the ring? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.