Daybell's "No Plan, No Gain" Claim Rejected: Third Trial Jury Selection Complete

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 13, 2025

4.5

Share

Daybell's "No Plan, No Gain" Claim Rejected: Third Trial Jury Selection Complete

Idaho Falls, ID – Chad Daybell, the central figure in the high-profile Idaho murder case involving the deaths of JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan, saw his defense strategy significantly hampered this week. The judge presiding over his third trial rejected Daybell's argument of "no plan, no gain," a key component of his defense aiming to demonstrate a lack of premeditation in the deaths of the two children. This crucial ruling comes as jury selection for the trial, currently underway, nears completion.

The "no plan, no gain" defense, often used in murder cases to argue against premeditation and thus potentially lessen the severity of the charges, was deemed inadmissible by Judge Steven Boyce. The prosecution, led by Rob Wood, successfully argued that sufficient evidence exists to suggest a deliberate and premeditated plan to eliminate JJ and Tylee, preventing them from interfering with Daybell and his wife Lori Vallow Daybell’s alleged scheme.

<h3>Key Evidence Against Daybell's Claim</h3>

The prosecution presented compelling evidence challenging Daybell’s claim, highlighting several key points:

• The timing of the deaths: The proximity of the children's deaths to the couple's alleged financial and religious motivations raised significant concerns for the prosecution, directly contradicting the "no plan, no gain" argument.
• The concealment of the bodies: The deliberate and meticulous efforts to conceal the bodies of JJ and Tylee strongly suggested a calculated and premeditated act, undermining the defense's assertion of spontaneity.
• Lori Vallow Daybell's testimony: While Lori Daybell's testimony remains contested, certain aspects corroborated the prosecution's narrative of a planned and executed scheme, indirectly supporting the judge's decision.

This rejection significantly impacts Daybell's defense strategy, forcing his legal team to adapt their approach and focus on other arguments. The ruling has been met with mixed reactions, with some legal experts praising the judge's decision as upholding the integrity of the justice system, while others argue it limits Daybell's ability to present a robust defense.

<h3>Jury Selection Nearing Completion</h3>

Meanwhile, the process of selecting a jury for Daybell's third trial continues. The selection process has proven challenging, given the intense media coverage and public interest surrounding the case. Potential jurors are rigorously vetted to ensure impartiality and ability to render a fair verdict based solely on the evidence presented in court. The extensive vetting process reflects the gravity of the charges and the public’s expectation of a just outcome.

<h3>What Happens Next?</h3>

With the "no plan, no gain" defense dismissed and jury selection nearing completion, the trial is expected to commence shortly. The prosecution will present its case aiming to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Daybell was directly involved in the premeditated murders of JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan. Daybell's legal team will now focus on alternative strategies to challenge the prosecution’s evidence and secure a favorable verdict for their client. This case continues to captivate the nation, with the upcoming trial promising to reveal further details about this tragic and complex situation. Stay tuned for updates as the trial unfolds.

Keywords: Chad Daybell, Lori Vallow Daybell, JJ Vallow, Tylee Ryan, Idaho murders, trial, jury selection, "no plan, no gain" defense, premeditated murder, Rob Wood, Steven Boyce, Idaho Falls, legal news, crime news.