Daniel Cormier: Jon Jones Should Lose UFC Heavyweight Championship

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 21, 2025

4.8

Share

Daniel Cormier: Jon Jones Should Be Stripped of UFC Heavyweight Championship

Jon Jones' recent controversial win over Ciryl Gane at UFC 285 has sparked a firestorm of debate, with many prominent figures in the MMA world questioning the legitimacy of his victory and his reign as heavyweight champion. Among the most vocal critics is former UFC double champion Daniel Cormier, who believes Jones should be stripped of the title.

Cormier, a renowned analyst and commentator for ESPN, hasn't minced words in his assessment of Jones' performance and the circumstances surrounding his win. In a recent episode of his podcast, "DC & RC," Cormier laid out a compelling argument for why Jones should forfeit the heavyweight championship belt. His criticism centers not only on Jones' perceived lackluster performance but also on the broader implications for the integrity of the sport.

Jones' Performance and the Question of Dominance

Cormier's primary concern stems from Jones' seemingly underwhelming victory over Gane. While Jones secured a first-round submission, many felt his performance fell short of the dominant displays expected from a champion, particularly given Gane's reputation as a highly skilled and dangerous opponent. Cormier argues that a champion, especially one newly crowned in a different weight class, should demonstrate a clear and decisive dominance to justify their position at the top. This lack of dominance, he suggests, raises questions about Jones' true capabilities at heavyweight.

"He didn't look like a dominant champion," Cormier stated. "He won, but it wasn't the kind of performance that should solidify his place as heavyweight champion." This sentiment is echoed by many fans and analysts who believe Jones' victory, while technically a win, failed to showcase the kind of complete mastery usually associated with UFC championship bouts.

The Weight of Past Controversies

Adding fuel to the fire is Jones' extensive history of controversies outside the octagon. These past transgressions, which include multiple failed drug tests and run-ins with the law, cast a long shadow over his achievements. Cormier argues that these past incidents, coupled with his perceived underwhelming performance against Gane, make a compelling case for stripping Jones of the title. The UFC, Cormier implies, has a responsibility to uphold the integrity of the sport and send a strong message that such behavior won't be tolerated.

"It's more than just the fight," Cormier emphasized. "It's about the example he sets. The UFC needs to show that there are consequences for actions, both inside and outside the cage."

The Future of the Heavyweight Division

The controversy surrounding Jones' victory leaves the future of the UFC heavyweight division uncertain. Cormier’s call for Jones to be stripped of the title opens the door for a potential rematch with Gane or a fight with other top contenders like Stipe Miocic or Francis Ngannou. This would allow for a more definitive determination of the true heavyweight champion, ensuring a more compelling and legitimate title picture for fans. The UFC's decision will significantly impact the direction of the heavyweight division and its overall credibility.

Conclusion: A Crucial Decision for the UFC

Ultimately, the decision on whether to strip Jon Jones of his heavyweight championship rests with the UFC. However, Cormier's outspoken criticism highlights a growing concern among fans and analysts about the legitimacy of Jones' reign. The UFC must carefully consider the implications of its decision, weighing the sporting merit of Jones' victory against the wider context of his past actions and the overall health of the heavyweight division. The future of the heavyweight title, and the perception of the UFC itself, hangs in the balance. What do you think? Should Jon Jones be stripped of the title? Let us know in the comments below.