Boxing Legend De La Hoya Unleashes On Devin Haney Post-Lopez Fight

James

3 min read

Post on Jun 06, 2025

4.2

Share

Boxing Legend Oscar De La Hoya Unleashes on Devin Haney Post-Lopez Fight: "He's Boring!"

Oscar De La Hoya, the legendary boxing champion, didn't pull any punches in his post-fight assessment of Devin Haney's victory over Vasyl Lomachenko. De La Hoya, known for his outspoken nature and sharp boxing acumen, criticized Haney's performance, calling it "boring" and questioning his fighting style. The controversial comments have ignited a firestorm of debate within the boxing community, sparking discussions about Haney's fighting strategy and his future in the sport.

The fight, which saw Haney successfully defend his undisputed lightweight titles against Lomachenko, was widely anticipated as a clash of titans. However, De La Hoya's critique suggests the fight failed to live up to its hype for many viewers, including himself. His strong words have certainly added fuel to the already heated debate surrounding Haney's style.

<h3>De La Hoya's Scathing Criticism: More Than Just a Disagreement</h3>

De La Hoya didn't mince words in his post-fight interview, expressing his disappointment with Haney's performance. He described the fight as lacking the excitement and dynamism expected from a clash between two such highly skilled boxers. Instead of praising Haney's victory, De La Hoya focused on what he perceived as a lack of aggression and a reliance on a defensive, counter-punching style.

"He's boring," De La Hoya stated bluntly, a comment that has resonated strongly with a segment of the boxing fanbase. Many viewers echoed De La Hoya's sentiment, arguing that Haney's strategy prioritized protecting his undefeated record over putting on a thrilling spectacle. This raises questions about the balance between strategic boxing and entertaining the audience. Is there a point where a purely defensive approach becomes detrimental to the sport's popularity?

<h3>Haney's Response and the Ongoing Debate</h3>

Haney, naturally, has responded to De La Hoya's criticism, defending his strategic approach. He highlighted the importance of securing a victory against a formidable opponent like Lomachenko, emphasizing that his primary goal was to win, not necessarily to engage in a brawl. This highlights a fundamental difference in philosophy between the two fighters and their respective approaches to the sport.

The debate extends beyond a simple disagreement about one fight. It touches upon the broader question of what constitutes a great boxer. Is it solely about power and aggression, or does strategic brilliance and defensive prowess play an equally significant role? This question continues to divide boxing fans and experts alike.

<h3>The Future of Devin Haney and the Lightweight Division</h3>

Despite the controversy, Haney remains the undisputed lightweight champion. His victory over Lomachenko further solidifies his position at the top of the division. However, De La Hoya's comments highlight a potential vulnerability: a perceived lack of crowd-pleasing dynamism that could affect his marketability and future fight selections. Will Haney adapt his style to meet audience expectations, or will he remain true to his strategic approach? This question remains unanswered and forms the crux of the ongoing debate. Only time will tell how Haney’s career unfolds after this controversial fight and De La Hoya's impactful commentary.

What are your thoughts on De La Hoya's criticism of Haney? Share your opinion in the comments below!